www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Mathematical Question
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Mathematical Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
augusthouse



Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 1195
Location: New South Wales Australia

PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Mathematical Question Reply with quote

I've been reading a couple of older posts and have a question.

A picture tells a thousand words - so here's the picture:




References:
http://www.scharfphoto.com/stockphotos/archives/000695.php

http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=879

When I look at David Scharf's images I can immediately comprehend (somewhat) the actual size of the object I am looking at; unless I am reading it incorrectly. I originally found the link to David Scharf's website in the post by Charlie above. (I realise that it is an SEM and there are no optical lenses involved. That 'Color Synthesizer' is...well..extraordinary).

What is the formula...for someone who is not a mathematician.

For example; what is the correct information that should accompany the image I posted here:

http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5541


Craig
_________________
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 20353
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What is the formula...for someone who is not a mathematician.

Forget formulas (said the mathematician Wink ). The intuition is that in making the print, you have to magnify the sensor by 169/15.5.

So the overall magnification becomes 20*(169/15.5) = 218.

20x @ 23.7 x 15.5 mm

becomes

218x @ 254 x 169 mm.

(And you'll have to crop 4 mm from the end of the larger image, since 23.7 x 15.5 actually scales to 258 x 169 mm, not 254 x 169 mm.)

Quote:
For example; what is the correct information that should accompany the image I posted

There are lots of different kinds of "correct" information that might be provided. Magnification at specified image size is one; field width is another; scale bar is a third.

The key rule is just never specify magnification by itself.

In the image that you posted, you specified magnification at the sensor and the sensor size, so you covered the bases correctly.

Whether that's the best approach is another question.

I think it works well here in the forum, where so many of us are used to thinking in terms of sensors and lenses.

For use outside the forum, I suspect it would be better to follow Scharf's approach: specify magnification in terms of an 8"x10" print -- something you'd ordinarily view at reading distance. That number is also close to the power of microscope that you would need to see the same field. In your example, we calculate 218X; looking through a 200X scope would show a similar view.

The earlier thread you referenced makes a case for embedding a scale bar in the image. The main advantage of that approach is that the scale information never gets lost. However, scale bars do require some education and practice on the part of the viewer. So, they're often not the best approach for communicating with the general public. And of course if the main point of an image is its beauty, then scale bars are very much out of place.

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group