Scales at 41X

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Scales at 41X

Post by Macrero »

Another scales stack. X-T3 + Oly 50/0.80 + Apo-Gerogon 150 at 41.5X on sensor.

Image

Bigger: https://images2.imgbox.com/23/b0/l34J0Doj_o.jpg

Best,

- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

abpho
Posts: 1524
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:11 pm
Location: Earth

Post by abpho »

Beautiful image..
I'm in Canada! Isn't that weird?

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Post by Macrero »

Thank you, abpho!
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

Rikisub
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:21 am
Location: Spain
Contact:

Post by Rikisub »

Great image, as all the ones you take and publish here.

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Post by Macrero »

Thank you Riki,

high-mag work isn't my strong suit and my current setup is not perfect for high magnifications, I should improve it. However, I'm pretty happy with the result I'm getting, considering hardware limitations.

Best,

- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

davidguitar
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 7:23 am
Location: Sverige
Contact:

Post by davidguitar »

Really Nice shot! Is this made with the olympus LMplanFl 50x? what tubelens did u use?

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Post by Macrero »

davidguitar wrote:Really Nice shot! Is this made with the olympus LMplanFl 50x?
Thank you, David,,

no, the L is the Long WD version with NA 0.50. For this stack I used the "regular" 50X/0.80 objective.
davidguitar wrote: what tubelens did u use?
Macrero wrote:X-T3 + Oly 50/0.80 + Apo-Gerogon 150.
Best,

- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

dolmadis
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:51 pm
Location: UK

Post by dolmadis »

Hi

Great result, I agree.

Continuous Lighting? How did you configure this please?

BR


John

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Post by Macrero »

dolmadis wrote:Hi

Great result, I agree.

Continuous Lighting? How did you configure this please?

BR


John
Thank you, John,

yes, continuos: three 1100 Lms LEDs and a simple plastic diffuser.

Image

I pretty much solved the external vibrations isues in a homemade way, separating the setup base from the table with vibration damping materials I had at hand.

The other issue I had at those magnifications was the movement of the wings. I solved that gluying the wings on an aluminum L bracket, screwed to the positioning stage.

Best,

- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

dolmadis
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:51 pm
Location: UK

Post by dolmadis »

Thank you for sharing your approach.

As your strap line says.............

Gives great support for others (including me) who wish to go further.

BR


John

abpho
Posts: 1524
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:11 pm
Location: Earth

Post by abpho »

Macrero wrote:The other issue I had at those magnifications was the movement of the wings. I solved that gluying the wings on an aluminum L bracket, screwed to the positioning stage.
Interesting. I was actually contemplating how you mounted your wing. I originally sandwiched the wing between two pieces of card stock. With a small window cut into one of them. I hope to give this a shot shortly.

Cheers.
I'm in Canada! Isn't that weird?

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

Very nice. The rows seem to have more space under them than is common. Did you try a 3D pair?
Chris R

Macrero
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Valladolid , Spain

Post by Macrero »

dolmadis wrote:Thank you for sharing your approach.

As your strap line says.............

Gives great support for others (including me) who wish to go further.

BR


John
Happy to help!

abpho wrote:Interesting. I was actually contemplating how you mounted your wing. I originally sandwiched the wing between two pieces of card stock. With a small window cut into one of them. I hope to give this a shot shortly.

Cheers.
Yours is an curious approach, never tried it. Mine works well, though it is obviously a destructive one.
ChrisR wrote:Very nice. The rows seem to have more space under them than is common. Did you try a 3D pair?
Thank you, Chris,

no, I've never done a "stereo". I actually am unable to see them properly, no matter how hard I try :(

Best,

- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light

quenoteam
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:35 pm
Location: Málaga [Spain]
Contact:

Post by quenoteam »

A exhaustive job with a fantastic result
Thanks for sharing

Adalbert
Posts: 2465
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:09 pm

Post by Adalbert »

Very nice!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic