Scales at 41X
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Scales at 41X
Another scales stack. X-T3 + Oly 50/0.80 + Apo-Gerogon 150 at 41.5X on sensor.
Bigger: https://images2.imgbox.com/23/b0/l34J0Doj_o.jpg
Best,
- Macrero
Bigger: https://images2.imgbox.com/23/b0/l34J0Doj_o.jpg
Best,
- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light
Thank you, abpho!
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light
Thank you Riki,
high-mag work isn't my strong suit and my current setup is not perfect for high magnifications, I should improve it. However, I'm pretty happy with the result I'm getting, considering hardware limitations.
Best,
- Macrero
high-mag work isn't my strong suit and my current setup is not perfect for high magnifications, I should improve it. However, I'm pretty happy with the result I'm getting, considering hardware limitations.
Best,
- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 7:23 am
- Location: Sverige
- Contact:
Thank you, David,,davidguitar wrote:Really Nice shot! Is this made with the olympus LMplanFl 50x?
no, the L is the Long WD version with NA 0.50. For this stack I used the "regular" 50X/0.80 objective.
davidguitar wrote: what tubelens did u use?
Best,Macrero wrote:X-T3 + Oly 50/0.80 + Apo-Gerogon 150.
- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light
Thank you, John,dolmadis wrote:Hi
Great result, I agree.
Continuous Lighting? How did you configure this please?
BR
John
yes, continuos: three 1100 Lms LEDs and a simple plastic diffuser.
I pretty much solved the external vibrations isues in a homemade way, separating the setup base from the table with vibration damping materials I had at hand.
The other issue I had at those magnifications was the movement of the wings. I solved that gluying the wings on an aluminum L bracket, screwed to the positioning stage.
Best,
- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light
Interesting. I was actually contemplating how you mounted your wing. I originally sandwiched the wing between two pieces of card stock. With a small window cut into one of them. I hope to give this a shot shortly.Macrero wrote:The other issue I had at those magnifications was the movement of the wings. I solved that gluying the wings on an aluminum L bracket, screwed to the positioning stage.
Cheers.
I'm in Canada! Isn't that weird?
Happy to help!dolmadis wrote:Thank you for sharing your approach.
As your strap line says.............
Gives great support for others (including me) who wish to go further.
BR
John
Yours is an curious approach, never tried it. Mine works well, though it is obviously a destructive one.abpho wrote:Interesting. I was actually contemplating how you mounted your wing. I originally sandwiched the wing between two pieces of card stock. With a small window cut into one of them. I hope to give this a shot shortly.
Cheers.
Thank you, Chris,ChrisR wrote:Very nice. The rows seem to have more space under them than is common. Did you try a 3D pair?
no, I've never done a "stereo". I actually am unable to see them properly, no matter how hard I try
Best,
- Macrero
https://500px.com/macrero - Amateurs worry about equipment, Pros worry about money, Masters worry about Light