HI,
Can anyone shed light on the difference between magnification (ratio) and focal length (mm) in terms of practical results?
Am trying to unpick lens selection, and likely reproduction outcomes
Many thanks in advance
N*
Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 24209
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
enstaUK, welcome aboard!
Example: if you have a sensor with width 23 mm (APS-C), and your lens focuses from infinity to 2:1, then the smallest subject that will fill your sensor is 23/2 = 11.5 mm.
Focal length does not matter much -- that only affects how far you can be from your subject ("working distance"), at any specified magnification.
No single example is very meaningful. Working distance varies a lot between lenses, even at the same nominal focal length.
What is your application?
--Rik
Magnification is key -- that determines what size subject will fill your sensor.Can anyone shed light on the difference between magnification (ratio) and focal length (mm) in terms of practical results?
Am trying to unpick lens selection, and likely reproduction outcomes
Example: if you have a sensor with width 23 mm (APS-C), and your lens focuses from infinity to 2:1, then the smallest subject that will fill your sensor is 23/2 = 11.5 mm.
Focal length does not matter much -- that only affects how far you can be from your subject ("working distance"), at any specified magnification.
No single example is very meaningful. Working distance varies a lot between lenses, even at the same nominal focal length.
What is your application?
--Rik
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
Thanks for this
So, where all things are equal, distance to subject and mag ratio, how does focal length affect things if at all?
A 50mm and a 100mm at same mag, distance and subject will give the same size reproduction? Or diff
For me, the application in this case is sugar. Framing a composition thats an inch square or so, and having the resolution to zoom in and see the individual crystals, sharp.
Body is a Sony A7R
Cheers,
N*
So, where all things are equal, distance to subject and mag ratio, how does focal length affect things if at all?
A 50mm and a 100mm at same mag, distance and subject will give the same size reproduction? Or diff
For me, the application in this case is sugar. Framing a composition thats an inch square or so, and having the resolution to zoom in and see the individual crystals, sharp.
Body is a Sony A7R
Cheers,
N*
rjlittlefield wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 5:29 pmenstaUK, welcome aboard!
Magnification is key -- that determines what size subject will fill your sensor.Can anyone shed light on the difference between magnification (ratio) and focal length (mm) in terms of practical results?
Am trying to unpick lens selection, and likely reproduction outcomes
Example: if you have a sensor with width 23 mm (APS-C), and your lens focuses from infinity to 2:1, then the smallest subject that will fill your sensor is 23/2 = 11.5 mm.
Focal length does not matter much -- that only affects how far you can be from your subject ("working distance"), at any specified magnification.
No single example is very meaningful. Working distance varies a lot between lenses, even at the same nominal focal length.
What is your application?
--Rik
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 24209
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
Distance to subject will make some difference in perspective. But the difference will not be obvious unless you also have structures visible in the far background, like bushes behind mushrooms.
In general, longer lenses will give you more working distance at same magnification. But modern lenses actually change their focal length as they focus closer, some more than others, so it is difficult to predict from lens specifications exactly how this will work out.
Sony A7R has a full-frame sensor, very close to 24 x 36 mm. A one inch square will need about 1X to fill the center square of the sensor. Any modern macro lens should do that job with no problem.For me, the application in this case is sugar. Framing a composition thats an inch square or so, and having the resolution to zoom in and see the individual crystals, sharp.
Body is a Sony A7R
If you want to have everything in the image sharp, then probably you will need to use focus stacking. The only exception would be if you were shooting straight down on a thin flat layer of crystals.
--Rik
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
Thanks
Yes, will be focus stacking.
So why is it with telephoto that focal length has so much impact, and none, for macro?
Beyond DoF type consideration?
Cheers
Yes, will be focus stacking.
So why is it with telephoto that focal length has so much impact, and none, for macro?
Beyond DoF type consideration?
Cheers
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 24209
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
It's mostly a matter of how you use the lens: what you decide to hold constant, what to change, and what to pay attention to.
Please tell me your thoughts about how focal length has big impact with telephoto, and I'll compare and contrast with macro.
--Rik
- MarkSturtevant
- Posts: 2100
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 6:52 pm
- Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
There are variables that complicate the picture, but as a general rule a shorter focal length macro lens will require a shorter working distance for the same magnification. Such a lens will also present a wider angle of view of the surroundings, and this can be either a good or less good thing, depending on what one wants. There is a good chance that the shorter focal length lens will be lighter in weight, but will also cost less. Given a closer working distance, lighting on the subject can be more challenging with a shorter focal length lens.
Some of these things may be important for your application, while others are not. 90-100 mm macro lenses are a very popular focal length since they strike a good balance of qualities for a lot of people.
Some of these things may be important for your application, while others are not. 90-100 mm macro lenses are a very popular focal length since they strike a good balance of qualities for a lot of people.
Mark Sturtevant
Dept. of Still Waters
Dept. of Still Waters
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
I think, everything relevant had been addressed. For a visual explanation, please have a look at this video, I think it covers most of the aspects of the different focal lengths: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJXDVDXvD44 , including graphics and pictures to show the effects.
So I wouldn't say, the impact in "none". Yes, you can reach, let's say 1:1 magnification with nearly every focal length, but that does not mean that all lenses will give the same final result. It may be true if you are taking pictures of flat objects. But if the z-axis cones into play, you have to consider the focal length.
-- Matthias
Re: Magnification vs Focal Lenght in Macro Shooting
Just to clear up one thing: there's not DoF consideration when it comes to focal length in macro applications (or anywhere else).
DoF depends on the magnification and aperture, regardless of the focal length used. So you'll get the same DoF with a 5mm or 50mm or 500mm lens at 1x at f4.0.
What changes are - as others have already mentioned - working distance and extension if you're working with bellows.
That being said there's one more aspect that's very important when it comes to focal length and macro photography: background rendition.
With a long focal length you can get a smoother background due to a narrower perspective/compression. That can be very pleasing, especially outdoors. However that is mostly relevant when it comes to lower magnifications and when you can't isolate your subject from a very busy background otherwise.