I tested the Nikon CF Plan 50X 0.55 EPI ELWD mounted on a 200mm f/4 Sakar lens on my Canon 60D.
74 photo stack at 0.00033mm (1/3 micron) increments.
100% crop:
My initial impression is extremely positive. The CA isn't nearly as bad as with the Nikon M Plan 40x. I'll post more images when I can find a more interesting subject.
To see more of my butterfly scale photos, click here.
Testing a Nikon CF Plan 50X 0.55 EPI ELWD (Butterfly Scales)
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Testing a Nikon CF Plan 50X 0.55 EPI ELWD (Butterfly Scales)
Last edited by Noah212 on Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Website:
www.Nmacro.com
Blog:
http://blog.nmacro.com
Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nmacro/
The MagRig:
www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19325
www.Nmacro.com
Blog:
http://blog.nmacro.com
Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nmacro/
The MagRig:
www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19325
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
I like that objective a lot. Sometimes I push it down to 25X with a 100 mm tube lens. See for example http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=16216 and the followup at http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 825#103825.
--Rik
--Rik
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Yes, assuming that Noah212 has the same lens I do. In "Nikon CF Plan 50X 0.55 EPI ELWD mounted on a 200mm f/4 Sakar lens", the Sakar is serving as tube lens.dolmadis wrote:Is this an infinite objective on a tube lens?
Or 1.29 microns for 1/4 wavelength aberration at 390 nm visible light (DOF=lambda/NA^2).jotafoto wrote:This calculation is wrong. With this lens on a Canon 5D Mark II 50X cuts have to be 1.7 microns with 30% overlap
In any case, shooting steps finer than necessary has no great harm, and it allows to easily find out what steps are necessary, by reprocessing the stack with skip factors 2, 3, 4, etc.
--Rik