Unidentified bug with a cute nose
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Unidentified bug with a cute nose
When I put the rubbish out the other day, this little fellow was on the bins looking up at me:
Nikon D60 with Tamron 90mm Macro
Nikon D60 with Tamron 90mm Macro
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23608
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Definitely gives the impression of a weevil, family Curculionidae, the "snout beetles".
But when I look closely at the front of this beast, I think that the parts sticking forward are two antennae, arising from between the eyes. I don't think it really has any snout that I can see. This is not to say that it's definitely a different family, just that it's an odd critter in any case.
Perhaps someone else recognizes it more specifically?
--Rik
But when I look closely at the front of this beast, I think that the parts sticking forward are two antennae, arising from between the eyes. I don't think it really has any snout that I can see. This is not to say that it's definitely a different family, just that it's an odd critter in any case.
Perhaps someone else recognizes it more specifically?
--Rik
Re: Unidentified bug with a cute nose
You're the first person I've ever heard of that takes their camera along when putting out the rubbishIainp wrote:When I put the rubbish out the other day, this little fellow was on the bins looking up at me:
\
p.s. Nice shots of a cute insect.
- rovebeetle
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
What a poor critter! That's definitely a weevil, but the snout is broken off. That is the genus Curculio (probably C. glandium)and they usually have a very long snout with the antennae originating at about half-length of the snout. So what Rik seems to see here are definitely not antennae but the basal stump of the snout. I wonder in what accident that poor guy was involved.rjlittlefield wrote:But when I look closely at the front of this beast, I think that the parts sticking forward are two antennae, arising from between the eyes. I don't think it really has any snout that I can see. This is not to say that it's definitely a different family, just that it's an odd critter in any case.
Perhaps someone else recognizes it more specifically?
--Rik
Was that beetle still alive?
Cheers
Harry
Ahh yes I think Harry (Rovebeetle) has nailed it, I was going to say the same thing myself last night but I wasn't sure, and knowing how diverse the weevil group is I thought I might be wrong.
I suspect this fella should look like this: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... ght=weevil
and a closer up view I shot some time ago of a similar weevil, though this one does not include the whole snout: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... ght=weevil
I suspect this fella should look like this: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... ght=weevil
and a closer up view I shot some time ago of a similar weevil, though this one does not include the whole snout: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... ght=weevil
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23608
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Excellent -- many thanks for the insight.rovebeetle wrote:So what Rik seems to see here are definitely not antennae but the basal stump of the snout.
That possibility did not even occur to me.
I was locked into making sense of what I could see, with the implicit assumption that the subject was undamaged.
It's those things you don't know you don't know, that will get you into trouble!
--Rik
-
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, England