No condenser vs U-ULC

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

No condenser vs U-ULC

Post by pwnell »

In a recent thread I was advised to try out the U-ULC condenser to enhance the quality of photography at low magnifications. Here is a test I performed showing why I cannot justify $700 on a U-ULC condenser if it makes NO difference to swinging out the TLD condenser in the universal condenser assembly. All photos straight out of the camera - no processing applied.

Image
4x/0.16, Universal Condenser with TLO in place.

Image
4x/0.16, Universal Condenser with TLO swung out.

Image
4x/0.16, U-ULC condenser at 0.16 NA (matches 4/0.16 objective).

Image
2x/0.08, Universal Condenser with TLO in place.

Image
2x/0.08, Universal Condenser with TLO swung out.

Image
2x/0.08, U-ULC condenser at 0.16 NA.

Fero
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:02 pm
Location: Svosov, Slovakia

Re: No condenser vs U-ULC

Post by Fero »

thank you, very useful info

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic