SEM: Dandelion pollen
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
SEM: Dandelion pollen
Hey guys,
How I would love to win the lottery buy my own SEM!! An absolute dream come through it would be. Here's a couple of scans I did a while back of Taraxacum pollen.
Suggestions for subjects and feedback welcome.
Apologies for the poor image quality. The site does not allow me to upload greater resolution. They can however be seen on my Flickr page.
Thanks!
How I would love to win the lottery buy my own SEM!! An absolute dream come through it would be. Here's a couple of scans I did a while back of Taraxacum pollen.
Suggestions for subjects and feedback welcome.
Apologies for the poor image quality. The site does not allow me to upload greater resolution. They can however be seen on my Flickr page.
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 2:40 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
I have toyed with the idea of owning a SEM over the years - never bit but every so often think about it. I have seen several 80's models in the $5-10k range (But shipping is going to really cost.) Here is one that sold for US$1400 https://www.govdeals.com/index.cfm?fa=m ... cctid=7218 that is less than quite a few optical set-ups.
I bought and used a Cambridge Instruments Stereoscan at work back in the eighties. You would probably need to spend a few hundred over-hauling the pumps but would very likely still get a decent image off of it up to ~30-50,000x. The Stereoscans where good in that you didn't need complicated hook-ups with nitrogen/compressed air etc. - you just plugged them in to the socket. Standard filaments so vacuum requirements are not too bad (compared to field emission) and they had a small neat turbo pump. But of course you still need to buy a gold coater, and they are at least another $1000 (And a new target will double that)
I bought and used a Cambridge Instruments Stereoscan at work back in the eighties. You would probably need to spend a few hundred over-hauling the pumps but would very likely still get a decent image off of it up to ~30-50,000x. The Stereoscans where good in that you didn't need complicated hook-ups with nitrogen/compressed air etc. - you just plugged them in to the socket. Standard filaments so vacuum requirements are not too bad (compared to field emission) and they had a small neat turbo pump. But of course you still need to buy a gold coater, and they are at least another $1000 (And a new target will double that)
Lovely images, Karl!
I suppose the first edition of tabletop SEMs will come up on the secondhand market soon. Up to 10.000x (only), but at least the electronics are still fresh.
Best wishes, René
Hi Gary, around 2002 I have started up exactly this machine in a botanical lab, after storage for a few years. I remember having to call the service tech quite a few times due to failing chip sets. Unless you're into electronics as well, I wouldn't advice on such an adventure ;-)siliconGary wrote:Here is one that sold for US$1400 https://www.govdeals.com/index.cfm?fa=m ... cctid=7218
I suppose the first edition of tabletop SEMs will come up on the secondhand market soon. Up to 10.000x (only), but at least the electronics are still fresh.
Best wishes, René
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact:
Nice pictures and interesting!
I like the colorizing - well done. Is this a totally manual process in Adobe PS or some similar program?
Regards Jörgen
I like the colorizing - well done. Is this a totally manual process in Adobe PS or some similar program?
Regards Jörgen
Jörgen Hellberg, my webbsite www.hellberg.photo