Search found 673 matches
- Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:49 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Two small contributions of new member from southern bavaria
- Replies: 29
- Views: 32892
This has been an interesting test. I'll probably clean this up and post separately to make it easier to find later, but since folks are already watching this thread I thought I'd post here for continuity now. --Rik It has been most instructive. When you posted the PMax series I was about to reply a...
- Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:24 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Stackshot Rail
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4339
Look at it from a different angle - why did they start selling an extended rail ? Hmmm, maybe because a lot of customers felt limited by the standard length ? Yes, presumably a lot of their customers are using it more for 'close up' than for macro photography. With a large step size (cm or mm rathe...
- Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:20 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Novoflex Bellows Distance with Adapters
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2690
How did you plan to mount the RZ lenses onto the bellows? I can't find any Novoflex adapter for it. If you were to construct your own that would leave you with 105mm (RZ flange distance) - 40mm (minimum bellows distance) - 13mm (CANA-AF) = 52mm for an adapter minus 44mm EOS register distance = 8mm ...
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:24 am
- Forum: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- Topic: FAQ: List of close-up lenses
- Replies: 9
- Views: 68627
It does. I see other more recent prices, like this one from 2009 at 59 eur second hand. I have updated the main article.dickb wrote: This seems like a very low price to me:
>Minolta sample price, No.0, USD 15.95
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:19 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Question about aperture and extension tubes.
- Replies: 28
- Views: 17109
We need to be careful what "front" means. Rørslett writes "This lens can give an excellent macro setup, when a 6T close-up lens is added and the lens then is reversed using the BR-2/2A and BR-5 adapters." In the final configuration, the close-up lens sits between the main lens and the camera, so it...
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:03 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Question about aperture and extension tubes.
- Replies: 28
- Views: 17109
In a quick test varying exposure times to match the histograms, my rig says that a full f-stop is too much, 1/3 of an f-stop is not enough, and 2/3 of an f-stop is just about dead on. I'm not delighted by the remaining disagreement of about 1/4 f-stop (between 2/3 and 0.94), but it's close enough t...
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:14 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: lenses salvaged from broken NIKKOR 16-85mm
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5055
Re: Salivating
I am intrigued by the coils on the third assembly. Is this stabilization, focus or iris stuff? Two of them at right angles.... Those look to me like analog "voice coils" to drive the stabilization. Yes, those correspond to the group on the optical diagram marked "VR" which is Nikon-speak for "Vibra...
- Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:56 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Not All that Glitters is Gold
- Replies: 96
- Views: 36242
The only lenses that I have to the best of my knowledge that I could use as a tube lens would be either my Leica 180mm f3.4 Apo Telyt lens or my Leica 70-210 f4.0 Vario Elmar lens. Since the 180/3.4 is optimised for use at infinity (and is of excellent quality) , it would probably work very well as...
- Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:35 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Not All that Glitters is Gold
- Replies: 96
- Views: 36242
I don't know about the value of the lens but that is a very high worldwide mailing charge. I am seeing US $54.99 for the item plus US $59.72 for postage (and multiple stern warnings tha tthey use UPS only) to which should be added 20% of the total (item plus shipping) sales tax on import plus UPS '...
- Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:41 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: lenses salvaged from broken NIKKOR 16-85mm
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5055
- Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:43 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: How many pixels are really needed?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3099
When I say optimized sensors I mean with better designed pixels; pixels we se today in our cameras do not use the whole pixel area to gather light http://digitalcontentproducer.com/hdhdv/depth/Photodiode1.jpg As long as pixel design does not change the number of pixels will not matter because there...
- Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:37 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Pixels for use at 4-5X on an APS-sized sensor
- Replies: 37
- Views: 23733
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that f/11 was as sharp as it gets. Heavens no! Here's the f/11 image again, and then the matching f/5.6 that I shot at the same time. http://janrik.net/MiscSubj/2012/F11DiffractionAndPixels20120201/f11AerialImageX10.jpg http://janrik.net/MiscSubj/2012/F11DiffractionAndPix...
- Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:27 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Pixels for use at 4-5X on an APS-sized sensor
- Replies: 37
- Views: 23733
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:08 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Pixels for use at 4-5X on an APS-sized sensor
- Replies: 37
- Views: 23733
- Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:30 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Pixels for use at 4-5X on an APS-sized sensor
- Replies: 37
- Views: 23733
To add some Nikon values: 12.1 MPx 1.0 crop (Nikon D3S) f/12.7 Diffraction May Become Visible f/15.9 Diffraction Limits Extinction Resolution f/19 Diffraction Limits Standard Grayscale Resolution 16.2 MPx 1.0 crop (Nikon D4) f/11 Diffraction May Become Visible f/13.7 Diffraction Limits Extinction Re...