Search found 3214 matches
- Fri May 13, 2011 3:22 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Sensor cleaning
- Replies: 56
- Views: 18552
Rik, I’ve seen that reference before, but I don’t agree with it. First, what the heck is “medical grade methanol”? Perhaps they mean “drugstore grade isopropanol”? If they get the entire chemical wrong, maybe I can question the bit about a few parts per million of other substances? I’ve cleaned sens...
- Fri May 13, 2011 10:22 am
- Forum: General Discussion Forum and Community Announcements
- Topic: Ants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1887
These look like typical "scientific study" images -- a large number of species in standardized positions with flat lighting and limited specimen prep. Very different goals from most of the images presented at photomacrography.net. I think that distinction deserves emphasis. Most of the images in ou...
- Thu May 12, 2011 11:18 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: The Bratcam gets a Mitutoyo tube lens
- Replies: 17
- Views: 51153
The Bratcam gets a Mitutoyo tube lens--upgraded
Since posting this thread, I've upgraded the Bratcam's tube lens assembly. For anyone considering something similar, I recommend incorporating these additonal features. Both the earlier and current embodiments produce good results, but the newer version makes repeatable results easier to obtain. The...
- Thu May 12, 2011 6:41 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Mitutoyo/Nikon 2 - 5x infinity objectives for 24x36?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 8934
OK, finally got around to testing Mitutoyo objectives on full frame. They do vignette: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 3897#83897
- Thu May 12, 2011 6:36 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Mitutoyo objectives on full frame -- teleconverters too
- Replies: 34
- Views: 12684
Mitutoyo objectives on full frame -- teleconverters too
Following up on questions raised in other threads, I tested the Mitutoyo M Plan Apo series objectives on a Nikon D700 full-frame (36 x 23.9 mm) digital SLR. The trial was of interest because it was not known to what degree, if any, these objectives would vignette on a full-frame sensor. It is known ...
- Thu May 12, 2011 3:24 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Focusing rail: What do you use?
- Replies: 89
- Views: 47425
- Tue May 10, 2011 1:06 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Reflex camera Vs compact camera!
- Replies: 37
- Views: 15707
I can think of another problem--one I'm in the throes of dealing with in my own system. With my Nikon D200 DSLR, I get the impression that the viewfinder and sensor are not precisely the same optical distance from the lens. When an image is precisely focused in the viewfinder, the sensor is a bit to...
- Sun May 08, 2011 12:05 am
- Forum: Technical and Studio Photography -- Macro and Close-up
- Topic: Diaphora mendica
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4080
Very nice, Craig. Keep up the good work! I wouldn’t touch the saturation, unless the real moth actually looks more saturated to the eye. Your image looks appropriately natural to me, though I'm not familiar with this moth. Oversaturating in post seems to be a current fad, especially among landscape ...
- Sat May 07, 2011 5:21 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: More LCD diffuser playing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3837
I use x-pol almost every day. It is a very straightforward technique--not much mystery to it, once you try it. While there is distinct coolness in scrounging materials, as Brian is doing, the more boring among us can just buy what we need. For in front of the flash, I use Techspec Linear Polarizing ...
- Fri May 06, 2011 12:57 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Microscope objectives - recommendations?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 7435
Although I got it for the cone adapter, I have also used it to line all my lens hoods and some extension tubes etc. Very strongly agreed. I can't imagine any photomacrographer living without Protostar or a similar flocking material. Those cone adapters are terrible without it, but very good once li...
- Thu May 05, 2011 11:51 pm
- Forum: Technical and Studio Photography -- Macro and Close-up
- Topic: Got my linear stage :D the obligatory test shot....
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5421
- Thu May 05, 2011 2:20 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Smooth, non-shiny mounting surface for small stuff?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6223
Thanks, Rik. One of the things I like to do with the Bratcam is pull away from what I think of as the “tyranny of the flat.” Well-known microscopic approaches already reveal wonderful detail, so long as the specimen is kept perpendicular to the optics. However, with a number of small subjects, I’ve ...
- Wed May 04, 2011 2:34 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Smooth, non-shiny mounting surface for small stuff?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6223
Thanks for all the advice so far. It’s much appreciated. I should clarify that I’m not concerned about the reflections from my lights—those are pretty easy to deal with. What I want to avoid is reflections of the subject itself on the glass slide (or cover slip, if I place them on that, instead). Im...
- Tue May 03, 2011 1:11 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Smooth, non-shiny mounting surface for small stuff?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6223
I agree with Pau, the smoother and flatter you get the surface, the more reflective it becomes. But is this inexorable? The wavelength of visible light is measured in nanometers, while these subjects are measure in microns. Could there not be some substance whose surface irregularities stand betwee...
- Tue May 03, 2011 12:37 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Smooth, non-shiny mounting surface for small stuff?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6223
Thanks, Pau. As an example of what I'm thinking, carpet is not shiny because of its many surface irregularities. Similarly, sandpaper is not shiny because of its surface irregularities. But the surface irregularities in these two materials are differ in size by orders of magnitude. An ideal substrat...