Search found 18032 matches
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:47 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Yellowjacket "portrait"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 12484
Charlie, thanks for the additional info. I noticed the part about "Canon 35/2.8 photomacrography lens" in your initial posting, but somehow I never made the leap to realizing that this probably meant a tabletop setup. The lighting may have been serendipitous, but it was your artistic choice to keep ...
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:07 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Yellowjacket "portrait"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 12484
Rik "I'm intrigued by the blue reflection on the right eye and antenna. I don't see how your standard backlighting would do that, so I'm wondering if you're trying out some new illumination scheme. Care to elaborate?" Isn't it just a reflection of the blue background in the eye? DaveW, I'm thinking...
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:54 am
- Forum: Photography Through the Microscope
- Topic: The down of a thistle
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7722
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:17 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Hair! It's just hair!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6023
Aw, man, you guys are just way too good! :D Yep, cicada. Here's a wider shot, for those who don't know these beasts so well yet. http://www.janrik.net/MiscSubj/Cicada20060819/IMG_0947_small.jpg Notice that the ocelli look very different in this last shot -- red versus glowing yellow. That puzzled me...
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:19 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Yellowjacket "portrait"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 12484
"Snick!" (That's the sound of the already high bar being raised yet another notch.) Very, very nice! I'm intrigued by the blue reflection on the right eye and antenna. I don't see how your standard backlighting would do that, so I'm wondering if you're trying out some new illumination scheme. Care t...
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:50 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Hair! It's just hair!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6023
Hair! It's just hair!
I've often wondered what makes the stripes on these beasts. Now I know. It's just hair -- alternating sections of bare and hairy cuticle! I leave it to you to figure out what the beast is. http://www.janrik.net/MiscSubj/Cicada20060819/IMG_0619-0732_75pctAndCrop.jpg Whoops, that's too hard. Let's mak...
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:44 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: New Macro Setup - Making Progress.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6356
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:50 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Anti-discrimination advertisement
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2691
- Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:14 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: flies in love
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3504
Or possibly Strauzia (Diptera:Tephritidae), http://bugguide.net/node/view/36887 . Same family, different genus, assuming that False Peacock Flies means Chaetorellia succinea , as Google suggests. Charlie, have you checked with U.Washington to see if there's an entomologist there with local knowledge...
- Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:52 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Dragon
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3357
Tom, welcome to the forum! :D This is a most interesting picture -- the wings are like a stained-glass mosaic. Very nice! Shot with natural light, you say, and a tripod. Yes, most interesting... :-k I would speculate that you cast some spell over this creature, but then I would have to admit that I ...
- Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:49 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: Bush Cricket/Phyllopalpus pulchellus
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2674
- Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:38 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: I am so full...Burrrrrp
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3577
I have a question...My camera only goes down to f8, I am probably not going to get too much DOF out of that right? Doug, Your f/8 is fine. That's because your camera has a small sensor. It turns out that what really matters for DOF is not F-number by itself, but rather F-number divided by sensor si...
- Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion Forum and Community Announcements
- Topic: Greatly Disappointed in Canon
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5893
Still might want to bring this to Chuck's attention if it bugged you enough to post about it here. I agree. My best guess is that somebody in repair did not take the time to understand that the problem was original and not just acquired dirt. There are other possibilities. But in any case, I'll bet...
- Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Forum: Photography Through the Microscope
- Topic: Peristaltic waves down abdomen of tiny male mayfly
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6319
this is a wild and beautiful planet that we're on. Yeah, isn't it, though? :D And what's getting better and better is our collective ability to capture really neat stuff and share it with each other. I can remember way back before the Web...but I try not to! :D By the way, I really ought to mention...
- Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:33 pm
- Forum: Photography Through the Microscope
- Topic: Possible bacteria swarm ring
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8313
Tom, thanks for the info about video tools. It was very timely, as you can see by my other posting. I had not played with QuickTime Pro for quite a while -- long enough that my license had expired, but another $30 for a tool that solves a big problem is money well spent. That H.264 codec does work v...