Search found 1120 matches
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:02 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Can I push the resolution of a 1:1 macro lens?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4661
Re: Can I push the resolution of a 1:1 macro lens?
Hi Rik, I'm using a Canon 500D (APS-C; 15 MP; 4.68 µm pixel pitch). I haven't done an aperture series yet. I have tried out the EF 40mm f/2.8 for macro recently. I noticed that when I pushed it towards 1:1 (forward with extensions) and then even further towards 1.5:1 (reversed with extensions), I wo...
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:50 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Lomo 1.7X projective photoeyepiece
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4182
Re: Lomo 1.7X projective photoeyepiece
I think a focal reducer has a lot of potential but I'm not sure how you'd design one. I previously used an old enlarger lens which worked quite well. But for this, I'm particularly thinking of a 0.7x focal reducer (Speedbooster; Lens Turbo etc .) I even bought one recently to test for this purpose ...
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:41 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Lomo 1.7X projective photoeyepiece
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4182
Re: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
Well, anyway, I've had a backup plan. And then, another backup plan :D . Before I even considered LOMO PE 1.67x, the first option was to get AmScope DSLR adapter 2x or it's Chinese counterpart NDPL-1(2x), it's relatively cheap (~90$) and easy to adapt. The tests of such adapters was on prc68.com si...
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:28 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Can I push the resolution of a 1:1 macro lens?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4661
Can I push the resolution of a 1:1 macro lens?
Hi, I have a 150mm f/2.8 macro lens (Sigma APO EX DG IF HSM; last version before the OS). For insects, I would use it at f/8 and at its closest focus distance (1:1). My questions: Would I be able to see a little more detail resolved if I a) Pushed this lens past 1:1 with extension tubes or a telecon...
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:33 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2661
Re: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
Hi Pau, That looks interesting. If the monotube is 0.6x, that will hopefully result in a nice final magnification for your APS-C camera. The CFI projective will likely work similarly to DIN projectives. It's unlikely that Nikon changed this when moving from CF PL to CFI projectives. The intermediate...
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:24 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2661
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:59 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2661
Re: DSLR adaptation to Nikon AZ100 38mm Photoport
Background: I got the AZ-TP DSC 0.6x monocular phototube for my slowly growing AZ100M macro/micro frankescope Its photoport inner diameter is 38mm and the only option shown at Nikon literature is with 1X C-mount adapter 11mm FN for small sensor Digital Sight Series cameras. The tube lens is placed ...
- Sun Sep 20, 2020 7:48 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
I don't really understand that technique. Maybe I'm overthinking it? So a drop or two of cleaning liquid on a piece of lens tissue, then stretch it and run it into the objective? Getting anything microscope related in Australia is a struggle, lens tissues included. I'm quite conservative with the u...
- Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:25 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
Silicone oil immersion objectives seem to have even better characteristics than water. Higher NA and greater DOF. I wonder how difficult, or rather annoying the oil is to clean up. Cleaning up immersion oil is a major headache, it also ruins the stickers on the slides. But only if you object is emb...
- Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:19 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
I'd also love to try out silicone oil immersion objectives, they are however expensive and the immersion oil is very expensive too, I was quoted $200 a bottle. You could try matching the RI by using a glycerol solution (51 % at 20C) although dispersion will probably be different between glycerol an...
- Wed Sep 16, 2020 3:36 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: A couple macro questions
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2301
Re: A couple macro questions
I'm in the market for a good macro lens, so I've been doing some research lately. I'll be using it more for insects than herps. Second, has anyone used a reverse mounted lens for macro work? Hi, Are the insects very mobile? There's a big difference between bugs that you can approach to within a few...
- Sun Sep 13, 2020 3:49 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: Disastrous 100x oil immersion objective comparison
There's a multiple studies of this phenomenon in scientific literature, both theoretical and practical, which showed the fact that coverglass thickness won't matter on PSF of oil immersion objectives, as long as all conditions are optimal (oil immersion optical properties are highly influenced by e...
- Sat Sep 12, 2020 5:43 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: Disastrous 100x oil immersion objective comparison
I don't think there's anything wrong with those crops. The Fl (semi-apo), while significantly better corrected than an achro, will still show color fringing in areas of extreme contrast as in this case. Even the Super-Apo is showing some mild fringing. The N is a plain achromat, so no wonder it is ...
- Fri Sep 11, 2020 4:02 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: "Disastrous" (completely unexpected!!) 100x oil immersion objective comparison
- Replies: 38
- Views: 5105
Re: Disastrous 100x oil immersion objective comparison
Hi, I'm not sure what to make of this. How can there be colour finging in the centre with the UPlanFL? If the Plan N has fringes like this in the centre and in focus, it is likely defective. Could there be oil inside (not uncommon for the Plan Ns)? I don't have it myself but maybe someone could post...
- Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:47 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Reversed zoom lens technical questions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1922
Re: Reversed zoom lens technical questions
I know chasing "better" is probably silly, Ultimately, you would get the best if you shoot with a large aperture (just stopped down far enough to suppress spherical aberration) and then do focus stacking, if your subject is suitable for stacking. I'm also interested in an answer to your other initi...