www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Question Tufuse and average mode
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Question Tufuse and average mode

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nto



Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 181
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:24 am    Post subject: Question Tufuse and average mode Reply with quote

this and my small experience with tufuse and average mode,
I made stack of 310 jpg with olympus pln 10x na 0.25
aligned with CombineZM, stacked with Tufuse 1.34
through batch file I made sub-stack 10 .jpg for a total of 31 .tif tufuse with wMode = 0
I subsequently realizar stack of 31 .tif tufuse with wMode = 1






My question and this:
and posibile with parameters have intermediate result as sub-stack images published


Thank you for any answers or considerations!
_________________
Antonio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 19966
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Antonio,

I am not sure what you're asking, but let me try explaining anyway.

wMode 1 (maximum) does the best job of finding detail. But if there's no detail to find, it finds noise. The more frames it processes, the more noise it finds.

wMode 0 (weighted average) does a good job of preserving strong detail without finding so much noise. But weak detail gets lost. The more frames it processes, the more weak detail gets lost.

Combining modes 0 and 1 using sub-stacks, gives a compromise. It gives more detail and more noise than doing the whole stack in wMode 0, but less detail and less noise than doing the whole stack in wMode 1.

As far as I know, there are no parameters that will make TuFuse do this in a single run.

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nto



Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 181
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rik, write files manually .bat and stressful,
I wrote the program (vb4) for automatic writing,
I hope not to violate rules, in any case can delete links

http://www.webalice.it/antoniodelorenzo/photomacrography/BatchTufuse.zip

ciao
_________________
Antonio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group