www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Aperture setting when using reversed lens ?
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community devoted to the practices of photomacrography, amateur microscopy, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Aperture setting when using reversed lens ?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AndrewC



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 1408
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:47 pm    Post subject: Aperture setting when using reversed lens ? Reply with quote

When using a reversed lens (say an El-Nikkor 50mm f2.8 ) reversed on a bellows, what aperture setting do you use ? I know that most lens when used conventionally have a sweet spot at about f8 to f11 but I'm not quite so sure when reversing them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 12577
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sweet spot depends on magnification, and it's generally at a wider aperture when the lens is reversed than when it's used normally.

I haven't tested that exact lens, but other people have reported a sweet spot around f/5.6.

See http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=424 and http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=676 for some discussion of things to think about.

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
AndrewC



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 1408
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the answer Rik, it seems like most of the lenses work best one or two stops down from wide open. I'll run my own series of tests once my current eBay shopping spree bears fruit but it is always nice to benchmark against others.

Andrew
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cyclops



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2718
Location: North East of England

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with reversing a modern fast lens is that one end is bigger than t'other. The lens is asymmetrical so that when reversed you end up with a smaller aperture(the rear of the lens is now the front element and its 2 lot smaller than the true front element) This isn't too bad if you have good TTL flash and its digital but on older systems it can be a nightmare,especially with wide angles,which give the highest mag. I remember doing this with a 24mm on a film camera and having to factor in the pupillary magnification factor then work out the new subject to flash distance by hand!
_________________
Canon 30D | EOS Rebel 2000-film(aka EOS 300) | Panasonic FZ-7 EB | Vivitar/Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro lens | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Vivitar Series 1 19-35 f3.5-4.5 | Slik 88 Tripod. | My new blog:
http://mybackyardsafari.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 12577
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah yes, the "good old days" of film, when one did elaborate calculations to figure out what should work best, bracket around that to cover the likelihood that the calculation was not correct or not appropriate, and wait from hours to days to discover which setting in the bracket really did work best.

Somehow I don't miss those days at all. Very Happy

These days, I find that theory is still critical to understanding what varies with what and where the fundamental limitations lie, but experiments are so quick and easy that most questions like "what's the optimum aperture" are best answered by just trying them.

In the specific case of the EL Nikkor 50 mm f/2.8, the lens is definitely asymmetric (the rear element is very strongly curved), but the pupillary magnification factor is so close to 1 that it's not an issue.

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cyclops



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2718
Location: North East of England

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thing is if i want to do true macro I have to use the Canon which is a film camera,i so wish i could afford to upgrade to a DSLR!
_________________
Canon 30D | EOS Rebel 2000-film(aka EOS 300) | Panasonic FZ-7 EB | Vivitar/Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro lens | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Vivitar Series 1 19-35 f3.5-4.5 | Slik 88 Tripod. | My new blog:
http://mybackyardsafari.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group