| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Charles Krebs

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 4076 Location: Issaquah, WA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: Helicon Focus 4.40, "Method B" |
|
|
For all you "stackers" using Helicon Focus it might be worth your time to check out the latest 4.40 version. It gives a choice of 2 "methods". Method B greatly reduces the dreaded "halo" that sometimes occurs around the edges of a subject. Sometimes Method B loses a small bit of detail on the subjects edges (not always!... depends on subject and background), but it will be a big help for some stacks. (In certain instances, if there is a slight loss in edge detail, I could see running both "A" and "B" and doing some judicious combining). _________________ http://www.krebsmicro.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
microcollector

Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 221 Location: Port Orchard, Washington
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have tried the B mode on a couple of micro minerals stacks and was very pleased with the results. I also noticed that the out of focus background seemed to look a bit better.
Doug _________________ micro minerals - the the unseen beauty of the mineral kingdom
Microminerals - Canon 550D/Nikon D300 on Nikon PB-6 bellows with 4X or 10X Nikon finite objectives or Nikon 105 Micro Nikkor AI f2.8 lens.
Other macro photos Nikon D300 with Nikkor 105 VR ED IF lens.
My Mindat Mineral Photos
http://www.mindat.org/user-362.html#2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 12588 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
And a counterpoint...
I tried Method B on my spider pedipalp; the result was a disaster. Method A worked fine although it did produce some halo. But Method B gave large fuzzy regions where bristles overlapped, failed to render some isolated bristles sharply at all, and created obvious banding in the background from what had previously been an unnoticed shift in background brightness from back to front of the stack. This was with default parameters R=8, S=4. I tested using default parameters for auto-adjustment, and also with auto-adjustment turned off; there was no significant difference.
At this time, I speculate that Method B is suited to simple geometries where there are no fine details isolated in space. More investigation required, obviously. My best recommendation at this point is "give it a try" (and tell us what happens).
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 12588 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|