Eyepiece w. the smallest magn. for the self-made stereo mic
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Eyepiece w. the smallest magn. for the self-made stereo mic
Hello everybody,
Does anybody know how to build a microscope for the small magnifications?
Something like stereo-microscope but mono :-)
What lens could be used as an eyepiece (with the smallest magn. as possible)?
For the objectives : finite Zeiss or infinite NIKON/Mitutoyo.
BR, ADi
Does anybody know how to build a microscope for the small magnifications?
Something like stereo-microscope but mono :-)
What lens could be used as an eyepiece (with the smallest magn. as possible)?
For the objectives : finite Zeiss or infinite NIKON/Mitutoyo.
BR, ADi
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
My experiments with camera lenses repurposed as microscope eyepieces were not encouraging. In most cases I had to keep my eyes extremely close to the lens, and sometimes it was simply impossible to see anything more than a very narrow field of view.
Another problem is that typical microscope objectives are designed to work best with 10x eyepieces. You can indeed use eyepieces with lower magnification, but the result is that the angle of view decreases accordingly, so you do get a lower magnification but you do not see a wider field of view of the subject.
So my recommendation is just to use a good high-eye-relief 10x eyepiece with a reasonably wide field of view (you can get a field number up to about 26, although 22 is already quite wide). If you need low magnification, simply choose a low-magnification objective with an image circle at least as wide as the field number of the eyepiece. Most recent Nikon and Olympus eyepieces have no built-in color compensation and work well with most recent infinity objectives, including Mitutoyo M Plan Apos. Finite Zeiss objectives require a matching correction in the eyepieces, so you must use matching Zeiss eyepieces.
Without prisms or relay optics, the image in the eyepiece will be inverted. I guess you already know this.
Another problem is that typical microscope objectives are designed to work best with 10x eyepieces. You can indeed use eyepieces with lower magnification, but the result is that the angle of view decreases accordingly, so you do get a lower magnification but you do not see a wider field of view of the subject.
So my recommendation is just to use a good high-eye-relief 10x eyepiece with a reasonably wide field of view (you can get a field number up to about 26, although 22 is already quite wide). If you need low magnification, simply choose a low-magnification objective with an image circle at least as wide as the field number of the eyepiece. Most recent Nikon and Olympus eyepieces have no built-in color compensation and work well with most recent infinity objectives, including Mitutoyo M Plan Apos. Finite Zeiss objectives require a matching correction in the eyepieces, so you must use matching Zeiss eyepieces.
Without prisms or relay optics, the image in the eyepiece will be inverted. I guess you already know this.
--ES
Hello Enrico,
Thank you for the hints!
I would like to assemble a kind of a stereo-microscope but mono.
I don’t need stereo because I cannot see stereo
So, I could use a monocle telescope (e.g. 8x) and a lens 200mm (e.g. Sigma LSA or CANON EF 70-200L) as in the following DIY-solution (but mono)
http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/uster2/uster2.htm
The second solution (expensive) could be Zeiss Mono:
https://shop.zeiss.de/ZEISS-Mono-4x12-T ... 7006205004
So, I’m looking for the monocular 8x or zoom at the moment :-)
BR, ADi
Thank you for the hints!
I would like to assemble a kind of a stereo-microscope but mono.
I don’t need stereo because I cannot see stereo
So, I could use a monocle telescope (e.g. 8x) and a lens 200mm (e.g. Sigma LSA or CANON EF 70-200L) as in the following DIY-solution (but mono)
http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/uster2/uster2.htm
The second solution (expensive) could be Zeiss Mono:
https://shop.zeiss.de/ZEISS-Mono-4x12-T ... 7006205004
So, I’m looking for the monocular 8x or zoom at the moment :-)
BR, ADi
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
Hi Enrico
Do excuse my ignorance but I do not recognise the term "CMO solution" but it may be an increasingly senior lapse !!
So would you mount the Binocular on an easily erected stand or frame for convenience/stability?
And use an objective from a fairly standard stereo mic?
Thanks for posting and extending this quest.
BR
John
Do excuse my ignorance but I do not recognise the term "CMO solution" but it may be an increasingly senior lapse !!
So would you mount the Binocular on an easily erected stand or frame for convenience/stability?
And use an objective from a fairly standard stereo mic?
Thanks for posting and extending this quest.
BR
John
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
I would try first without a focusing stand and stage. For magnifications up to 2x or so, I may manage in the field without a stand and focuser. My binoculars have a tripod mount that can be used for attaching a home-made or 3D-printed support to hold the added objective at the right position.dolmadis wrote:[...]
So would you mount the Binocular on an easily erected stand or frame for convenience/stability?
And use an objective from a fairly standard stereo mic?
The link quoted above suggests using an achromat objective from larger binoculars, but a generic achromat with a diameter of 40-50 mm will probably work. I also have a few add-on magnification lenses (Raynox, Sigma Life Size etc.) that might be suitable and are worth testing.
A dedicated stereomicroscope objective is likely both too expensive and too heavy for this use.
--ES