Focus stack m3z

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

houstontx
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:07 pm

Focus stack m3z

Post by houstontx »

Is it possible to use a leica m3z (CMO) stereoscope to focus stack? Through the phototube? through the eyepiece?

Thanks for your input,

Olympusman
Posts: 5090
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm

Stereoscope

Post by Olympusman »

I tried stacking wit a stereo microscope some time ago. I found there is to much shift as you focus to get anything to stack.

Mike
Michael Reese Much FRMS EMS Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA

houstontx
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:07 pm

Post by houstontx »

Doesn't a common main objective (CMO) prevent this shift during focusing?

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6071
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

No, in a CMO the light paths for both eyes are still oblique to the optical objective axis, although likely in lesser extent than Greenough.
Some high end stereos have another central path for the photoport, but I don't think that the M3Z is one of them. I've just tested with mine and there is some displacement. That said, stacking could be possible as software can deal with displacements but I never tried it.
Pau

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23622
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

The displacements are annoying but typically not a deal-breaker.

With Zerene Stacker, what happens is that both ends of the image may develop "edge streaks" in the areas that get shifted out of frame at any point in the stack. The central area that is in frame throughout the stack will be rendered clearly.

It is best if the camera optics are set up so that the frame is entirely occupied by subject, with no vignetting even in the corners. Otherwise the alignment method may lock onto the vignette instead of tracking the subject. This problem can often be worked around by specifying an on-the-fly crop that removes the vignette, using Options > Preprocessing > Image Pre-cropping.

If the displacements are unusually large, you may also want to increase the limits for Shift X and Shift Y, at Options > Preferences > Alignment.

--Rik

JohnyM
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:02 am

Post by JohnyM »

Not sure if that helps, but in my experience, no stereoscope can produce better image (stacked or not) than Mp-E65, which is also cheaper than any scope. Only con i've found is that Mp-E65 is not parafocal when zooming.

houstontx
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:07 pm

Post by houstontx »

Thanks for the replies. Eventually I will move to a focus stacking rig. I have a 105mm Micro-Nikkor I use occasionally but I don't have a rail setup yet. For the pictures I take a stereo zoom works for now. And you can't beat the ease of use. I was hoping to try a few stacks with a phototube from an M5A non CMO, but not sure if it is compatible with the M3Z.

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6071
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

an M5A non CMO
If you refer to the Leica/Wild M5A it is CMO, I have it (Apo version, but it's the same). Its phototube is not compatible at all with other models (except the Motic K series chinese clones)
Pau

houstontx
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:07 pm

Post by houstontx »

Interesting thanks Pau! I'll try some stacks this week.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic